Kurt Munz is an assistant professor of marketing at Bocconi University. He takes an experimental approach to research in consumer behavior, and often focuses on the influence of new technology on consumer judgment and decision making.

  • Full Bio
  • Download CV

Publications  (Click for abstract / download options)

Morwitz, Vicki G. and Kurt P. Munz (2021) , “Intentions,” Consumer Psychology Review, 4 (1), 26-41.

| Link to Journal

Intentions are one of the most widely used constructs in consumer research. We review over 50 years of research that has helped us understand what intentions are, their antecedents and consequences, and how best to measure and use them as a proxy for or predictor of behavior. We define intentions and differentiate them from other closely relatedly psychological constructs. We review several psychological theories where intentions play a central role and highlight what is known about the strength of the intentions-behavior relationship, and factors that moderate the strength of that relationship. We also review more methodological research and discuss what is known about how to best measure intentions and use them to predict behavior. Finally, we suggest opportunities for continued research on intentions and discuss their continued relevance in a world of big data.

Munz, Kurt P. , Minah H. Jung, and Adam L. Alter (2020) , “Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization,” Marketing Science, 39 (6), 1071-1091.

Download Paper | Link to Journal | Open Science
 

In a randomized field experiment with the education charitable giving platform DonorsChoose.org (N = 30,297), we examined email personalization using a potential donor’s name. We measured the effectiveness of matching potential donors to specific teachers in need based on surname, surname initial letters, gender, ethnicity, and surname country of origin. Full surname matching was most effective, with potential donors being more likely to open an email, click on a link in the email, and donate to a teacher who shared their own surname. They also donated more money overall. Our results suggest that uniting people with shared names is an effective individual-level approach to email personalization. Potential donors who shared a surname first-letter but not an entire name with teachers also behaved more generously. We discuss how using a person’s name in marketing communications may capture attention and bridge social distance.

Working Papers

“Gender-Ambiguous Voices and Social Processing Fluency in Product Judgments,” by Shahryar Mohsenin and Kurt Munz.

  2021 Bocconi Junior Research Grant


 

A gender-ambiguous voice was recently added to a major voice assistant to avoid gender stereotypes and introduce a wide audience to a nonbinary voice. However, if people react negatively to such voices, these laudable efforts may be counterproductive. In six experiments (N = 1,819) we find that people do react negatively, rating products described by narrators with gender-ambiguous voices less favorably than when they are described by clearly male or female narrators. This is due to the voices creating a feeling of unease related to difficulty understanding the gender of the narrator (social processing disfluency) that spills over to affect evaluations of the products being described. These effects are not caused by bias against members of the LGBTQ community, as they can be eliminated by increasing familiarity with the voices. Thus, initial automatic negative reactions can be overcome with more exposure.

“Sound Judgment: Evaluability and Memory in Speech-based Product Evaluation and Choice,” by Kurt Munz and Vicki Morwitz.

  2018 Center for Global Economy and Business Grant

Download Paper | Open Science
 

Voice assistants often present choices where consumers listen to product options. But do consumers process information differently when listening compared to reading? Bridging theories on evaluability and memory, six experiments, including one conducted in consumers’ homes on Alexa voice speakers, demonstrate that consumers listening to speech utilize higher-evaluability product information (which can be understood without making comparisons to other options) to guide their judgments and choices relatively more than consumers reading the same text. A difference in memory drives this tendency. This is because (1) due to its ephemeral nature, processing speech requires greater reliance on memory and (2) information higher in evaluability is more easily remembered. Thus, higher-evaluability information is likely to be remembered regardless of presentation mode (speech vs. text), while memory for lower-evaluability information is likely to favor text, leading to the observed effect. The findings speak to the evaluability, memory, and auditory information processing literatures, and underscore that marketing managers presenting choices via speech will do well to highlight favorable highly-evaluable information about products such as recommendations, sales ranks, or descriptions such as “like new.” Substantively, a new format for presenting information is demonstrated which may improve voice-based sales.

“Spreading of Alternatives Without a Perception of Choice,” by Kurt Munz and Vicki Morwitz.

Download Paper
 

Choosing something improves a person’s attitude toward it, a classic example of behavior affecting attitudes. Three studies re-examine the causal role of behavior in this “post-choice spreading of alternatives” phenomenon, demonstrating that neither the behavior of choosing nor the self-perception of having made a choice is required for it to occur. A rationalization process similar to the one that follows from actively choosing can occur whenever someone merely accepts an outcome as a true state of affairs. When a person accepts an externally assigned outcome, the negative features of that outcome no longer seem as important, allowing attitudes to improve. People normally accept outcomes they have personally chosen, but they may also accept outcomes they neither chose nor could reject. Thus, we question the causal role of behavior in a classic phenomenon. This finding contradicts explanations for post-choice spreading based on self-perception theory, where people learn their attitudes from their own voluntary behaviors. Though future work would be needed to confirm, we also discuss potential implications for cognitive dissonance theory, suggesting that agency over choice may not be prerequisite for dissonance, as previously believed. Relaxing this prerequisite expands the scope of phenomena to which dissonance theory could potentially apply.

Conference Presentations

Mohsenin, Shahryar and Kurt P. Munz (2022), “Disfluency Activates Heuristic Reasoning,” Paper presented at the 8th Mediterranean Symposium for Consumer Behavior Research Conference Madrid.

  Best Student Presentation

Contrary to previous findings on the association between disfluency and information processing, three preregistered studies demonstrate that disfluency causes consumers to simplify difficult-seeming decisions by using heuristics. The results demonstrate that disfluency leads to a greater reliance on “heuristic” reasoning where consumers utilize information such as a brand name or a recommendation to make their choice. This tendency to rely on heuristic information in the face of disfluency is more pronounced among decision-makers high in Need for Cognition.

Mohsenin, Shahryar and Kurt P. Munz (2022), “Social-Processing Fluency in Voice-Based Judgment,” Poster presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Conference Conference Virtual.

Does using a gender-neutral voice affect information processing and product judgment? Processing Fluency literature says the difficulty in information processing leads to the negative judgment of the information and product presented in that information at the metacognitive level. While research in this area has involved textual information, scant research attention on fluency has been paid to the social nature of communication. We investigate a novel concept, “social-processing fluency”, related to the ease or difficulty of identifying the demographic information about the source of voice information (i.e., gender) used to determine social categorization.

Mohsenin & Munz 2022 SJDM

Download Poster

Munz, Kurt P. and Vicki G. Morwitz (2020), “Not-so Easy Listening: Roots and Repercussions of Auditory Choice Difficulty in Voice Commerce,” Special Session Paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference Virtual.

Six experiments demonstrate that choosing from options presented by voice (versus text) increases the cognitive burden on consumers (due to difficulty making comparisons), leading them to choose recommended items more often but also to defer choice at higher rates. Auditory consumers focus on context-independent “evaluable” product features to guide judgment.

Munz, Kurt P. and Vicki G. Morwitz (2019), “Not-so Easy Listening: Roots and Repercussions of Auditory Choice Difficulty in Voice Commerce,” Paper presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making Conference Montreal, Canada.

Six experiments demonstrate that information presented by voice is more difficult to process than the same information in writing. As a result, auditory choosers are less able to differentiate choice options, leading them to choose recommended items more often, but also to defer choice at higher rates. Difficulty making comparisons contributes to these effects, reducing the impact of certain context effects. Voice presentation also negatively affects evaluations of single items when compared against a salient reference in memory, and thus may have important ramifications for decision makers using digital voice assistants for shopping.

Munz, Kurt P. and Vicki G. Morwitz (2018), “Spreading of Alternatives Without a Perception of Choice,” Paper presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Conference Conference New Orleans, LA.

Choosing an option leads to more favorable attitudes toward that option compared to before choice. Three studies demonstrate that
this “post choice spreading of alternatives” may not require choice at all. Spreading depends on accepting an outcome, rather than on
the behavior of choosing or self-perception of having chosen. People normally accept the outcomes of their own choices, but they can
also accept outcomes they did not have personal agency to choose or the freedom to reject. Higher outcome acceptance predicts
greater post-outcome attitude change.

Munz, Kurt P. , Minah H. Jung, and Adam L. Alter (2018), “Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization,” Poster presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Conference Conference New Orleans, LA.

In a randomized email field experiment with DonorsChoose.org (N = 30,297), donors who shared a surname with a teacher were more likely to open, click, donate, and donated more to the teacher’s classroom. Different-surname donors were also more generous when they shared a first-letter with the requesting teacher. We quantify various components of similarity including matches on full name, initial name letters, gender, ethnicity, and country of origin.

Download Poster

Munz, Kurt P. and Vicki G. Morwitz (2018), “Spreading of Alternatives Without a Perception of Choice,” Competitive paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference Dallas, TX.

Choosing an option leads to more favorable attitudes toward that option compared to before choice. Three studies demonstrate that this “post choice spreading of alternatives” may not require choice at all. Spreading depends on accepting an outcome, rather than on the behavior of choosing or self-perception of having chosen.

Munz, Kurt P. and Alixandra Barasch (2018), “Losing Fast or Slow? Preferences for Uncertainty Resolution,” Special session paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference Dallas, TX.

Is losing better resolved quickly, or does holding onto hope for a positive outcome improve an otherwise negative experience? In three lab studies and one field study, consumers preferred to learn that they would lose later in a game compared to winning, but changed their preference after playing the game.

Munz, Kurt P. , Minah H. Jung, and Adam L. Alter (2018), “Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization,” Symposium presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Conference Dallas, TX.

In a randomized field experiment with DonorsChoose.org (N = 30,297), potential donors who shared a surname with a teacher were more likely to open, click, donate, and donated more to the teacher’s classroom in response to an email request. We highlight how overtly personalizing an email to highlight a recipient’s identity can be effective to persuade them to donate to charity. Controlling for ethnicity, we also find that different-surname donors were more generous when they shared a surname first-letter with a requesting teacher.

Munz, Kurt P. and Vicki G. Morwitz (2018), “Spreading of Alternatives Without A Perception of Choice,” Individual paper presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Conference Dallas, TX.

Choosing a product leads to more favorable attitudes toward it (and more negative attitudes toward rejected options) compared to before a choice. This “post-choice spreading of alternatives” has been explained in terms of cognitive dissonance theory. Researchers have recently claimed that only a perception of having made a choice (vs. actual choice) is required for this spreading effect. We demonstrate in three experiments that even this perception is not necessary: spreading of alternatives can occur absent choice or a perception of having chosen. Thus, self-perceiving choice agency may not be prerequisite for dissonance, as previously believed.

Munz, Kurt P. , Minah H. Jung, and Adam L. Alter (2017), “Charitable Giving to Teachers with the Same Name: A Field Experiment,” Special session presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference San Diego, CA.

In a randomized email field experiment with DonorsChoose.org (N = 30,302), donors who shared a surname with a teacher were more likely to open, click, donate, and donated more to the teacher’s classroom. Different-surname donors were also more generous when they shared a first-letter with the requesting teacher.

Munz, Kurt P. and Priya Raghubir (2016), “Sorting As Screening,” Poster presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Conference St. Petersburg, FL.

Sorting by a product attribute can diminish the importance weight of that attribute. When choosing is difficult, consumers may treat sorting as screening. Once options are sorted, consumers may form a consideration set comprising the options at the top. Because these options are more homogeneous with respect to the sorted attribute, consumers pay less attention to the sorted attribute in favor of a second attribute. This attentional shift emerges in a subsequent conjoint analysis, with less weight placed on the sorted attribute and more weight on a second attribute.

Download Poster